Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 02:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
Fact of the matter is:
Everyone(!) here will argue to their own benefit.
For someone new to the game, understandably, they feel they should get a fair shot at getting their hands on these items as the dinasaurs or business mongooses OR would stop complaining if there was no (Functional) T2 BPO out there.
If someone are in possession of any T2 BPOs they will claim T2 BPOs hardly exist at all and they will at the same time lie about owning one while making any retorical argumentation available to torpedo anyone who argues for removal or reimplementation of T2 BPOs. We all understand that realisation of either of these two posibilitis would result in a major loss to these individuals. You are allowed to disagree but stuff the math up your arses, you're not fooling anyone.
Bottom line:
There is no real reason why T2 BPOs should be allowed to remain in game in there present form. Render them inert so people can keep the as collectables or some such OR re-introduced T2 BPOs in some form of another. This will form an equal market and, after all, getting new people to join in on the Eve experience without feeing they are going agains an unbeatable elite is what matters no?
Stay sharp,T2 BPOs are on their way (out)
(flunk out the last word... or not... whichever suits you). |

Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 03:25:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote:Schmacos tryne wrote:Fact of the matter is:
Facts
Dribble
Sight, it's like wankink off with a cheese grater....
Your reasoning is nothing else then crap and puts you into the secret T2 BPO owner category.
We'll all die of old age too eventually. No reason why the world woudn't benefit if some of us should be remeved in some way sooner rather then later.
If you for a second think you'll find a lot of 50bill+ BPO carrying Dhally Whallies flying around for you to wack at your conveniance, think again.
Get this into your narrow forhead: There is NO reason not to deal with T2 BPOs one way or another as pointed out in my previous post.
Just to **** everybody off, CCP should add them to the NEX store  |

Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
Shadowsword wrote:Hellenna Cain wrote:The only players that object to removing T2 BPOs are the ones that have them.
And they have the audacity to say that invention is better. I don't have one, I don't want them removed.And I have yet to see any motive here other than envy and jealousness to support their removal. By the way, did you know that some T2 BPOs are real cheap? I'm sure you can find something like a T2 micro-smartbomb BPO pour less than 500M, or a Wasp II BPO for les than 4B. Saying you can't obtain a T2 BPO is patently false.
Then why on earth should you care? |

Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 21:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Kengutsi Akira wrote: I was actually pretty pissed off when I realized there is effectively a hard ceiling on production in that you cant GET T2 BPOs anymore.
Then I realized the WHY of it. They need to do this in more games and yes, they need to remove the BPOs as well.
I'm not pissed but I *DO* get the fact that the owners of T2 BPO's would take a pretty hard hit if they get removed/reintroduced.
That being said, there is no need to remove them, just render them inert (can't be used, just as collectables for those who fancy these things).
This way, Invention/BPC's will be unaffected and still a valiable game-occupation.
The other way around, if they got re-introduced, why not let invention be the way to obtain new T2 BPOs (a marginal chance atleast)? This way Invention would be a very lucrative business which would result in either Failure, a BPC or in extreemly rare cases a BPO.
I guess I'm dim, but I still haven't seen a single good argument why they shouldn't be dealt with other than the people arguing for dealing with them is pittifull envious penisheads...
I guess the same could have been said about the people arguing for removal of learning skills and see how much better the game got after removing them... (Yeah the last part was ironic but screw it you (should) get my point since most people was pro removal of them). |
|
|